Lessee now. Purported President Barrack Obama took office in the beginning of 2009. That was some six years ago. As secretary of state, his top advisor on foreign policy, he appointed an unqualified woman with no experience whatsoever in the position – or any in any other position in government for that matter, our own Hillary Clinton. Since Obama himself was a neophyte in foreign policy, to put it mildly, as well as in everything else touching on governmental matters, one would have thought he would select someone for this all important post who was well qualified. Think again. Here’s the rub. An experienced foreign policy appointee may well likely have foreseen the rise of the Islamic State and would have better prepared us, and the rest of the free world for its advent.
So here we are, stuck with Obama’s incompetence, watching butchery being performed online virtually on a daily basis. And Obama says there has been an intelligence failure? Well such a statement coming from the liar, er, commander in chief is not surprising. Has this guy ever taken the blame for any of the scandals plaguing his administration? Its a rhetorical question. The answer is obvious. Yet he has the effrontery to tell Fox News Bill O’Reilly, last Super Bowl Sunday, that there is not even a smigen of corruption surrounding the IRS scandal. So much for truth in government.
The Islamic State has been a growing threat for a long time. But what about the role of the foreign policy advisor, the purported expert in foreign affairs, who has been a true sister of silence in forecasting trouble. With no experience in foreign affairs, never wrote, taught, lectured, nothing on foreign affairs, Hillary is the epitome of the worst political appointment any president can make. Four Americans died on her watch. Yet, she apparently considers herself to be the next coming of Margaret Thatcher and is therefore well qualified to be president. This is a manifestly false state of mind. She is no Margaret Thatcher. Her utterances to the public that her “experience” qualifies her to be president are part of the fraud she is perpetrating on the public. Wake up America! The truth is that this woman is eminently unqualified for any public office and is dangerous for the country. Her incompetence is there for anyone wanting to see it. The election of an unqualified and incompetent politician is a mistake the country cannot afford to have repeated.
So far as any lack of intelligence is concerned, blaming the rise of Isis on a lack of intelligence would be a laughable statement were it not for the deadly consequences of the lack. But the intelligence gap is within the president himself and not in any gap in the gathering of information. Perhaps Obama is a smart politician. Give him some credit for getting elected (his promises weren’t known to be false when he was running, however). But the credit stops there; there is no intelligence when it comes to having insight into foreign policy, not to mention judgement and understanding. Maybe in this vein, intelligence should be equated with experience and common sense. Once again its a question of a president who refuses to take the blame for his own personal shortcomings.
Inextricably tied in with the Middle East butchery is the failure by Obama to listen to advisors such as former CIA Director and Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, who urged him to leave a U.S. security force in Iraq in 2011 instead of a complete pullout. Obama, dead set on a complete withdrawal from Iraq, refused to listen, thereby putting politics over the national interest. The absence of U.S. forces created a vacuum, filled by sectarian chaos leading to the present state of affairs.
So, the so-called intelligence failure is more Obama mishmash. Its hogwash. What started out as the “JV team” some months ago is now the “network of death.” The lack of original perception into the unfolding events in the Middle East is a tribute to Obama’s lack of experience, his incompetence. He is in over his head. When will the country ever learn? Its the price we pay for living in a democracy, a free country. Anybody can run for president and if the country likes the message and the politician, qualified or not, experienced or not, he can get elected.
But something more than experience as a community organizer and an apparently reliable golf swing is needed for the presidency. Real nuts and bolts experience in confronting and handling problems, in making tough decisions, and in the demonstration of strong leadership qualities is needed. The country deserves it. The country, indeed the world, needs it. A repeat of the present inexperience and incompetency in Washington is out of the question. Hillary are you listening?
Copyright©Arnold G. Regardie. All rights reserved.